From: Factors associated with upper extremity use after stroke: a scoping review of accelerometry studies
Factor studied | Assessment used | Stroke stage | # subjects | Relation | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health condition | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Stroke type | Â | Subacute | 26 | 1 No | 0 |
Number of strokes | Â | Chronic | 46 | 1 No | 0 |
Lesion volume | Â | Chronic | 18 | 1 No | 0 |
Sensorimotor cortices myelination asymmetry | Sensorimotor cortex MWF | Chronic | 18 | 1 No | 0 |
Time since stroke | Â | Acute to chronic | 148 | 6 No | 00 |
Stroke severity | NIHSS | Acute to subacute | 401 | 6 Yes (M + S) | ++ |
NIHSS | Chronic | 15 | 1 No | ||
Number of comorbidities | Â | Chronic | 46 | 1 No | 0 |
Body structures and functions | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
UE motricity | BRS Hand & UE, FMA-UE, NIHSS-UE, SAFE, MI, CMSA, Grip strength | Acute to chronic | 982 | 26 Yes (M + S) | ++ |
FMA-UE | Chronic | 59 | 3 No | ||
UE Spasticity | mAS | Subacute | 26 | 1 No | 0 |
UE Pain | FMA-UE Pain | Subacute | 26 | 1 Yes (M) | + |
UE Sensory | FMA-UE sensory, Hand tactile detection | Acute to chronic | 61 | 2 No | 0 |
UE Oedema | Â | Acute | 130 | 1 No | 0 |
UE Kinematics | Motion capture system | Chronic | 45 | 1 Yes | + |
Compensatory movement | Trunk motion capture system, Video analysis | Chronic | 123 | 2 Yes (M) | + |
LE motricity | FMA-LE, BRS LE | Acute to subacute | 45 | 2 Yes (M) | + |
LE non-motor | FMA-LE sensory & pain, mAS | Subacute | 26 | 1 No | 0 |
Balance | Berg Balance Scale | Chronic | 15 | 1 No | 0 |
Neglect | CBS, GEREN, LeC, LiC, FT, C&R, Bisiach test | Acute to chronic | 35 | 1 Yes (M) | ? |
Dummy hand experimentation | Sub-acute | 25 | 1 No | ||
Visual impairment | Visual field, preferred gaze orientation | Acute to chronic | 35 | 1 No | 0 |
Anosognosia | CBS | Acute to chronic | 35 | 1 No | 0 |
Cognition | Short blessed test | Chronic | 46 | 1 No | 0 |
Depression | CESDS | Chronic | 46 | 1 No | 0 |
Activity limitations | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Unimanual UE | ARAT, WMFT, SIS-Hand, STEF, BBT, TEMPA, NHPT | Acute to chronic | 653 | 20 Y (S + M) | ++ |
ARAT, SIS-Hand | Chronic | 49 | 3 No | ||
Bimanual UE | CAHAI, ABILHAND, Ad-AHA stroke | Sub-acute to chronic | 158 | 5 Yes (S + M) | ++ |
Mobility | 10mWT, FAC, Independent walking 5STS, SIS-Mobility | Acute to subacute | 226 | 3 Yes (M + L) | ++ |
TUG, 10mWT, SIS-Mobility | Subacute & chronic | 60 | 2 No | ||
General autonomy | Independence in ADLs, Sunnaas ADL-Index, mRS | Acute to chronic | 103 | 3 Yes (M) | ?? |
mRS, FIM | Acute to chronic | 54 | 3 No | ||
Participation | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Physical activity | Number of steps, PAS | Acute to chronic | 80 | 3 No | 0 |
Personal factors | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Concordance | Â | Acute to chronic | 325 | 8 No | ?? |
 | Subacute to chronic | 199 | 5 Yes | ||
Sex | Â | Acute to chronic | 154 | 6 No | 00 |
Age | Â | Acute to chronic | 142 | 6 No | 00 |
 | Subacute | 26 | 1 Yes (L) | ||
Education | Â | Acute to chronic | 35 | 1 No | 0 |
Self-efficacy | CAHM, Self-perceived barriers | Subacute to chronic | 59 | 2 Yes (M) | + |
Environmental factors | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Time of the week | WE vs. WD | Sub-acute | 28 | 1 Yes (M) | + |
Living arrangement | Â | Chronic | 46 | 1 No | 0 |
Time in therapy | OT, PT | Sub-acute | 60 | 1 Yes | + |